Back to Chapter 7. Use of Directions by the Inquiry
| 8.1 | A parliamentary inquiry of the scale of the Banking Inquiry is a complex project and requires significant behind-the-scenes work to support the public hearings leading to the final report. |
| 8.2 | The Inquiry required very specific and wide-ranging expert skillsets to conduct the investigation phase, to advise the Joint Committee in the conduct of public hearings, and to support the drafting of the report. The Joint Committee decided that a recruitment / head-hunting approach would be the best fit for the diverse needs of the Inquiry. |
| 8.3 | Recruitment and selection of the team was challenging, due to –
|
| 8.4 | The Houses of the Oireachtas Service engaged an executive search & selection company to support recruitment of the investigation team commencing in mid-October 2014. The selection process was a three to four stage process with all appointments being approved by the Joint Committee:
|
| 8.5 | The Joint Committee adopted a process for assessing conflict which included the completion by candidates of a declaration of interest form. A small number of candidates were not approved by the Joint Committee for appointment to investigator roles on the basis of conflict with the terms of reference of the inquiry based on their prior work experience and/or declaration. A key concern was that no team member should have worked in a senior management or key decision-making role in any of the institutions being inquired into by the Joint Committee through oral and written evidence. |
| 8.6 | Each member of the Joint Committee was entitled to employ a parliamentary assistant to provide the required support to the member in his/her capacity as a member of the Inquiry63.Every member of the Joint Committee availed of this entitlement. |
| 8.7 | The Joint Committee agreed a protocol to govern interaction and contact between members, their parliamentary assistants and the investigation team, including escalation to the Joint Committee and Chairman, during the Nexus Phase. |
| 8.8 | The team of approximately 50 support staff comprised a secretariat, a team of investigators and a legal team. Resources were scaled up or down as needed during the various phases. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Figure 8.1: Banking Inquiry Organisation Chart
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.9 | The secretariat comprised staff of the Houses of the Oireachtas Service who provided general administrative support, procedural advice and communications support services to the Joint Committee. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.10 | The investigation team provided technical knowledge and expertise to assist the Joint Committee across the three main streams of the Inquiry terms of reference. Team members had backgrounds and experience in the areas of banking, financial regulation, and public service policy. The Senior and Lead Investigators were accountable to the Joint Committee for the investigation process. They were supported by a team of investigators comprising staff recruited on fixed-term contracts linked to the duration of the inquiry and civil servants seconded from relevant Departments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.11 | The in-house legal team comprised a legal adviser from the Office of the Parliamentary Legal Adviser, along with a team of lawyers recruited on fixed-term contracts linked to the duration of the inquiry. An external legal team of three Senior and two Junior Counsel provided additional capacity and advice where needed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.12 | Oversight and management of the Nexus Phase of the Inquiry was supported through a Steering Group, which met weekly and also held twice-weekly conference calls.
Figure 8.2: Banking Inquiry Steering Group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.13 | Expert support for the Context Phase of the Inquiry was provided by FTI Consulting in conjunction with Professor Karl Whelan, UCD, who were selected following an open tendering process. Expert support for the Relevant Proposal (scoping) Phase was provided on a pro bono basis by the following: Pat Casey, Paul Gorecki, Megan Greene, Cathal Guiomard, Conor McCabe, Colm McCarthy, Seamus McCarthy, Rafique Mottiar and John Shaw. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.14 | The 2013 Act has put in place a framework which is of general application for all future Oireachtas Committee inquiries into matters of significant public importance. The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform during the Second Stage debate on the 2013 Act064 said:“under the [Bill], responsibility is assigned exclusively to the Houses of the Oireachtas to determine the requirement for a formal inquiry, the terms of reference of that inquiry, the appropriate committee to conduct the inquiry and the procedural and organisational aspects of the inquiry.” | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.15 | If they are to conduct effective inquiries, Oireachtas Committees need a resourcing model which will provide a flexible framework for scoping of inquiries, development of terms of reference and quick delivery of relevant expertise to Committees who have been established as Part 2 inquiries. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.16 | The Banking Inquiry was a pioneering exercise and had to build everything from scratch. The Joint Committee acknowledges that future inquiries may be more modest in their scale and ambition but believes that the basic model of the Banking Inquiry can be scaled up or down to effectively support most inquiries.
Figure 8.3: Basic Inquiry Resourcing Model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.17 | The Joint Committee recommends that the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission should agree an optimum staffing structure and terms and conditions with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform to provide the necessary expert investigator and legal support for Committee inquiries in the next and future Dáileanna. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.18 | The Joint Committee further recommends that the Commission should engage with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform to secure the necessary flexibility for the Oireachtas to recruit expert support. This would include –
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.19 | As the first inquiry under the 2013 Act, the Banking Inquiry incurred a number of once-off, establishment costs. These included the development of a document management system to organise the significant volumes of documentation and evidence received by the inquiry. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.20 | The inquiry also required suitably secure accommodation adjacent to Leinster House. This required work to be conducted by the Office of Public Works in setting up the Inquiry Support Centre in Agriculture House, along with some adjustments to the layout of Committee Room 1 in LH2000 to facilitate the conduct of public hearings.
Figure 8.4: Inquiry set up, preparation and establishment estimated costs €000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.21 | The Inquiry running costs consisted in the large part of the salaries of support staff for the Joint Committee and members (some 83% of the total), along with external legal advice and public hearing costs.
Figure 8.5: Inquiry running costs (see figure 8.6 for graphic representation) €000
|
Figure 8.6 Running costs of the Banking Inquiry by category

Chapter 8 Footnotes
63. SI 564 of 2014 Oireachtas (Ministerial And Parliamentary Offices) (Secretarial Facilities) (Banking Inquiry) Regulations 2014
64. 22-May-13
65. Costs Include all costs incurred to 31 December 2015 and addiional estimated costs to the date of reporting in January 2016.